Actscelerate.com

Cojak

Roe V WAde, the latest leak

01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 **5/6/22 10:52 am**

The world of secrets or confidentiality has flown the coop. Remember when Secret Service Agents would never expose what they heard or seen in private of presidents acts and conversations. But Leaks started.

Now a leak from the most trusted area of our government.

I think most folks think Abortion is a State decision. But then I read a question: Should Slavery be a state decision?

Then someone said, "We cannot legislate Morality!" But we do legislate basically along the 10 commandments, or we used to.

I honestly abhor leaks. I do think there is such a thing as simple confidentiality. I KNOW many ministers discuss things with other ministers that would not fit being said from the pulpit. Not mean or sinful things, just personal beliefs and thoughts that would hurt some members or bother some. We all have conversations NOT meant for public disclosure. The leak bothered me much more than the content...... JMHO
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/

FLRon

Acts-celerater Posts: 787 **5/8/22 7:10 am**

There was a time when confidentiality meant exactly that. A long time ago I worked for a major defense contractor and had to go through all kinds of investigations in order to obtain a very high security clearance. The things I was warned that would happen to me should I violate the knowledge entrusted to me was more than enough to convince me to keep my mouth shut. Even now,decades later, I refuse to speak of those things.

I am afraid the deliberate leak at the Supreme Court was done for the purpose of political gain, and I suspect this will be a talking point all the way to November.
_________________
“Hell will be filled with people that didn’t cuss, didn’t drink, and may even have been baptized. Why? Because none of those things makes someone a Christian.”
Voddie Baucham

Cojak

01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 **5/8/22 11:12 pm**

Aaron Scott

Cojak...interesting question

Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6042 **5/9/22 2:04 pm**

Should slavery be a state decision?

I think our first impulse is to say NO! But when you think about it, we might say this: "Go ahead. Try it."

Why? Because other states will freeze that state into submission. They might not allow residents of that state to enter their state. The federal gov't will cut off all funding. No one will buy our sell with that state. People will leave the state in droves. Assuming we are talking about black slavery, not a single black person will live there...or maybe they ALL will (just to protect each other's back and take over).

You get the idea.

I'm NOT saying that is the way to go! But the difference is this: those who posed the question are equating slavery with abortion. But they are not at all alike. One subjugates blacks. The other actually tries to SAVE blacks (black unborn children). You get the idea.

What might actually be a better question is this: "If abortion is permitted, can we also kill people we don't care for?" THAT is more apples to apples than the question they are asking, I think.