Pastor's who teach the principle of the tithe

Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night

FAQ

Memberlist

Usergroups

Profile

r/Actscelerate

Pastor's who teach the principle of the tithe
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3

Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Feature Presentations

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.

View previous topic :: View next topic

Message

Author

krista

Resident Skeptic wrote:

Quote:

It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.

And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.

delete

Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:11 pm; edited 1 time in total

Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 11:21 am

Re: Pastor's who teach the principle of the tithe

TarheelBishop

Tracy S Hamilton wrote:

Jack Hayford
Robert Morris
Brady Boyd
Stovall Weems
Joel Osteen
Craig Groeschel
Andy Stanley - the blessing of being a percentage giver (tither)
Loran Livingston
Jentezen Franklin
Ed Young Sr.
Ed Young Jr.
Charles Blake
Bob Coy
Kerry Shook
Dave Stone
T.D. Jakes
Joe Champion
Creflo Dollar
Chuck Smith
Greg Surratt
Tommy Barnett
Jimmy Evans

The list could go on and on and on...... I think all of these men are pretty sound doctrinally and all teach on tithing. Surely that can't all be wrong or maybe they just haven't read Actscelerate.

+1
_________________
"This is just me thinking outloud!"

God bless our troops (especially the snipers)!

Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1753
3/7/12 1:59 pm

Re: Pastor's who teach the principle of the tithe

Resident Skeptic

TarheelBishop wrote:

Tracy S Hamilton wrote:

Yes, a hearty +1 for false teachers.

Trammell posts tons of scripture and Tracey posts a list of names. Umm, I'll go with Tremmell.

Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/7/12 2:09 pm

Resident Skeptic

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

Quote:

It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.

And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.

More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.

Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.

Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/7/12 2:10 pm

Re: Pastor's who teach the principle of the tithe

krista

Resident Skeptic wrote:

TarheelBishop wrote:

Tracy S Hamilton wrote:

Yes, a hearty +1 for false teachers.

Trammell posts tons of scripture and Tracey posts a list of names. Umm, I'll go with Tremmell.

delete

Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:11 pm; edited 1 time in total

Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 2:12 pm

krista

Major B. Trammell wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.

But, Trammell is not wrong on any of the points in his post in the Myths About Tithing/ Truths About Christian Giving post.

I know you haven't been here for a terribly long time, but krista's purpose on this board is not and never has been to engage in discussions on the issues. He/She trolls this forum looking for an opportunity to stifle discussion and truth that is opposed to traditions. He/She is a contrarian and, as far as I can tell a parody (a poster who is only here as a joke and/or to cause problems). He/She is not to be taken seriously. Since her (I use the feminine pronoun, here, since the name "krista" is feminine, but I don't really know its true identity) arrival, here on Acts, she has not ceased to follow me (and a couple of others) from thread to thread lobbing personal attacks instead of discussion. She stalks, harasses, and attacks and it just goes on and on without end.

For explicit proof of this just do a search of my posts over the past two days and then compare a search of hers over the same period of time (or I can just give links, if you wish) She's followed me to nearly every thread I've posted in and lobbed the personal attacks about my character, my pastorate, my integrity, my motives, and has implied falsehoods about me instead of engaging in the issue.

Then, she pretends to wonder why those she stalks, harasses, and attacks do not reply to her posts. The answer is because she is not seeking discussion. She is only seeking to continue her game.

And so it continues, unchecked.

delete

Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:12 pm; edited 1 time in total

Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 3:05 pm

krista

Resident Skeptic wrote:

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

Quote:

It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.

And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.

More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.

Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.

delete

Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:12 pm; edited 1 time in total

Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 3:36 pm

Resident Skeptic

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

Quote:

It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.

And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.

More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.

Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.

Then back it up. Those dozen times tithers miss it....back it up.

Trammell's original essay did indeed "back it up". You simply can't respond to his points. Pretending they aren't there won't change anything.

Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/7/12 4:13 pm

krista

Resident Skeptic wrote:

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

Quote:

It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.

And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.

More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.

Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.

Then back it up. Those dozen times tithers miss it....back it up.

Trammell's original essay did indeed "back it up". You simply can't respond to his points. Pretending they aren't there won't change anything.

delete

Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:13 pm; edited 1 time in total

Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 7:20 pm

Resident Skeptic

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

Quote:

It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.

And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.

More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.

Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.

Then back it up. Those dozen times tithers miss it....back it up.

Trammell's original essay did indeed "back it up". You simply can't respond to his points. Pretending they aren't there won't change anything.

Are you writing this as you draw Trammel's bathwater?

Every time you write something you prove just how desperate you are. You really aren't worth responding to.

Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/7/12 9:22 pm

krista

Resident Skeptic wrote:

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

krista wrote:

Resident Skeptic wrote:

Quote:

It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.

And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.

More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.

Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.

Then back it up. Those dozen times tithers miss it....back it up.

Trammell's original essay did indeed "back it up". You simply can't respond to his points. Pretending they aren't there won't change anything.

Are you writing this as you draw Trammel's bathwater?

Every time you write something you prove just how desperate you are. You really aren't worth responding to.

delete

Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/8/12 2:56 pm

Display posts from previous:

Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Feature Presentations
All times are GMT - 5 Hours Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow .