Actscelerate.com Forum Index Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
r/Actscelerate
Browse by what's: hot | new | rising | top of the week

Generally speaking, do you consider non-Trinitarians outside the faith?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
   Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Message Author
Post Generally speaking, do you consider non-Trinitarians outside the faith? Dave Dorsey
I say "generally speaking" because I'm sure most all of us would acknowledge that in any group there will be some who genuinely come to saving faith in Christ, and we all have all probably personally known non-Trinitarians that evidence the fruit of saving faith. Our buddy Resident Skeptic would be an example.

But with that said, denial of the Trinity has historically been considered an error so severe that it puts adherents outside the Christian faith, and virtually all of its significant manifestations (Sabellianism, Arianism, partialism, tritheism, etc.) have been specifically condemned as heresies.

What's your view?
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 13654
4/4/18 10:47 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt
In my view, having had fairly extensive personal experience with Oneness folks, I consider them certainly confused theologically. However, I am unaware of any place in the New Testament where affirmation of the doctrine of the trinity is stated as a condition of salvation, notwithstanding later creedal statements, correct as they may be.

I do find that the trinitarian view is the only coherent way to synthesize the scriptural data concerning God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. I will also say that trinitarians often misunderstand and misrepresent Oneness Pentecostalism, and, in my view, unfairly condemn it as a nonChristian cult.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12817
4/4/18 11:01 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Nature Boy Florida
QW is right.

Oneness folks believe in Jesus.

What else is a requirement in your Bible?
_________________
Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going today!
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16646
4/4/18 11:50 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Da Sheik
I believe people there are people saved in the UPC but in spite of the UPC doctrine. I certainly believe Oneness doctrine to be erroneous, but a cursory reading of the NT shows there were many Christians who believed all kinds of wacky stuff. Even some of the Corinthians didn't believe in the resurrection from the dead. Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1865
4/4/18 1:05 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
Outside of orthodoxy, but not outside of the faith. I think that begins when doctrines start taking anything away from Christ Himself (i.e. Mormonism, JW) Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
4/4/18 1:11 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Dave Dorsey
Da Sheik wrote:
I believe people there are people saved in the UPC but in spite of the UPC doctrine. I certainly believe Oneness doctrine to be erroneous, but a cursory reading of the NT shows there were many Christians who believed all kinds of wacky stuff. Even some of the Corinthians didn't believe in the resurrection from the dead.

Great observation (and from QW and UncleJD too). I think this gets to what QW was saying about consistency. I'm inclined to think that if a non-Trinitarian critically considered the implications of consistently holding their beliefs and chose to hold them anyway, it would be impossible for them to be inside the faith. But at the same time, I believe if a true believer did that, they would invariably turn from the error. And so perhaps you've got folks holding these unorthodox beliefs, but inconsistently, and God graciously working in them despite those beliefs. And thank God we are not saved by our theology, since none of us have perfect theology or hold our beliefs with perfect consistency.

Great feedback, gentlemen... thanks for the input.

How do you reconcile your views with the historic consensus of the church concerning non-Trinitarianism? Do you view modern-day Oneness beliefs as different in any way from Seballianism? (Not leading to anywhere here -- this hasn't been an area of study for me, so interested in your views.)
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 13654
4/4/18 1:18 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt
Dave Dorsey wrote:


How do you reconcile your views with the historic consensus of the church concerning non-Trinitarianism? Do you view modern-day Oneness beliefs as different in any way from Seballianism? (Not leading to anywhere here -- this hasn't been an area of study for me, so interested in your views.)


I suppose if I agreed with the idea that there is no salvation outside of strict orthodoxy, I would have to say Oneness believers could not possibly be saved. As one who conscientiously tries to not go beyond what is written in inspired Scripture concerning doctrine, I am obviously not bound to the creeds like, say, a Catholic, Orthodox, or even a confessional Calvinist or Lutheran might be.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12817
4/4/18 1:45 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Dave Dorsey
Quiet Wyatt wrote:
I suppose if I agreed with the idea that there is no salvation outside of strict orthodoxy

I doubt you could find anyone within common orthodoxy who holds this view.

But is there any point at which one's orthodoxy gets so loose that it is no longer actual Christianity? UncleJD makes a good observation here -- taking away (or adding to) the nature or work of Christ is probably a real solid plumb line.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 13654
4/4/18 2:04 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Cojak
Nature Boy Florida wrote:
QW is right.

Oneness folks believe in Jesus.

What else is a requirement in your Bible?


Cool Thumb Up

So no I do not. Cool
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/


Last edited by Cojak on 4/4/18 10:02 pm; edited 1 time in total
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
4/4/18 2:12 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post The Doctrine of the Trinity is the weakest doctrine of the church Aaron Scott
The doctrine of the trinity may be absolutely correct...but it is not without LEGITIMATE debate on the matter.

Over and over, in the scripture, Jesus uses the term "MY God." Yes, you can argue that that was Him speaking in His humanity, but He also said these things AFTER the resurrection--in fact, on the Isle of Patmos!

It's not that the trinity is not true. It's that the church INSISTS on it, despite it being so weak. I realize that the church is trying to avoid the errors that would arise if we do not endorse the deity of Christ, but when a doctrine is as weak as the trinity, you cannot fairly demand submission to that doctrine.

Yes, we KNOW that Jesus is God (John 1:1). What we DO NOT know is precisely how the Son and Father "fit" together. But that did not stop us insisting on this doctrine, and calling those who saw it another was as heretics.

If I recall my Church of God history, R.G. Spurling thought that the Council of Nicea was a departure from what God wanted for the church; namely: that the church deal with these things in love instead of by fiat.

NO ONE--and I mean NO ONE--can prove the Trinitarian doctrine without overlooking or explaining away a number of scriptures. And that is why it MUST NOT be used to decide the question of whether one is "in" the faith.

We have bomb-proof doctrine when it comes to claiming there is one God, that Jesus is the Son of God, that Jesus died for the sins of the world, rose again, and is coming again. These things are WITHOUT QUESTION among those who examine doctrine. The trinity is an add-on--probably out of fear (and I'm talking about the wider Church)--since to NOT hold to this doctrine exclusively is to risk being called heretical. It's the Emperor's New Clothes...and the church is OK with that.
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6042
4/4/18 2:38 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Doctrine of the Trinity is the weakest doctrine of the church caseyleejones
[quote="Aaron Scott"]The doctrine of the trinity may be absolutely correct...but it is not without LEGITIMATE debate on the matter.

No, tithing is.
Acts-perienced Poster
Posts: 11798
4/4/18 2:42 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post THE LOVE OF GOD
I believe they are saved as much as we are BUT I don't think most of them think the Trinitarians will make it to Heaven. They don't believe you are saved until you have repented, baptized in Jesus Name and receive the Holy Ghost. I don't know what they think you receive when you repent but they keep close numbers on the ones who receive the Holy Ghost. I have a lot of people who are Oneness and they are good people who really love the Lord but they are so indoctrinated with their belief. I don't know how Jesus can be His own Father and who was reigning in Heaven while Jesus was here on earth for 33 1/2 yrs? When we are together, we don't discuss doctrine.

Last edited by THE LOVE OF GOD on 4/4/18 8:55 pm; edited 1 time in total
Friendly Face
Posts: 387
4/4/18 3:14 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt
Oneness folks refer to the Father, Son and Spirit as three manifestations of the one true God. Their biggest disagreement is over the trinitarian concept of God in three persons. In any case, how they explain a lot of it is by referring to these as three (simultaneous) manifestations of God, not three persons. (The simultaneity of the three manifestations is how their view differs from classical Sabellianism, by the way).

The ones I’ve known wouldn’t say Jesus was his own father, or anything quite like that. They would instead say that Jesus is the fullness of the Godhead in bodily manifestation, while the Father is the manifestation of the Godhead in Heaven, and the Spirit is yet another manifestation of the Godhead.


Last edited by Quiet Wyatt on 4/4/18 5:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12817
4/4/18 3:45 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Doctrine of the Trinity is the weakest doctrine of the church roughridercog
[quote="caseyleejones"]
Aaron Scott wrote:
The doctrine of the trinity may be absolutely correct...but it is not without LEGITIMATE debate on the matter.

No, tithing is.


Some might say the rapture. Very Happy
_________________
Doctor of Bovinamodulation
Acts Mod
Posts: 25305
4/4/18 4:46 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post QW...yep Aaron Scott
Quiet Wyatt wrote:
Oneness folks refer to the Father, Son and Spirit as three manifestations of the one true God. Their biggest disagreement is over the trinitarian concept of God in three persons. In any case, how they explain a lot of it is by referring to these as three (simultaneous) manifestations of God, not three persons. (The simultaneity of the three manifestations is how their view differs from classical Sabellianism, by the way).

The ones I’ve known wouldn’t say Jesus was his own father, or anything quite like that. They would instead say that Jesus is the fullness of the Godhead in bodily manifestation, while the Father is the manifestation of the Godhead in Heaven, and the Spirit is yet another manifestation of the Godhead.


It was relatively easy, it seems, to defeat the Oneness doctrine if God were moving from one manifestation to the next. But when (I think it might have been Resident Skeptic) advised that another possible view of Oneness believers was of three simultaneous manifestations (which would fit well with omnipresence), it became more difficult to dismiss it, even though I think it is equivalent to our own three persons view.
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6042
4/5/18 8:51 am


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Old Time Country Preacher
Orthodox soteriology presents the biblical view that salvation is by faith alone, faith in the blood of Christ to forgive sin(s). Many within the UPC teach/believe that salvation is not complete until one receives the baptism in the HS and speaks in tongues. Does toying with biblical soteriology cause one to be outside the faith? Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 15570
4/5/18 11:08 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Link
Quiet Wyatt wrote:
In my view, having had fairly extensive personal experience with Oneness folks, I consider them certainly confused theologically. However, I am unaware of any place in the New Testament where affirmation of the doctrine of the trinity is stated as a condition of salvation, notwithstanding later creedal statements, correct as they may be.


Thumb Up
_________________
Link
Acts-perienced Poster
Posts: 11849
4/6/18 1:10 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post revuriah
My wife, who is absolutely a Trinitarian, teaches at a Christian school that is run by Oneness Pentecostals, UPC. They are sweet people. They love Jesus. The biggest issue with them isn’t the theological differences, it’s their hard “clothesline” dress beliefs, at least on a practical level.

Most of the teachers are Trinitarian, as well. Baptist, COG, and even a Catholic.

I think on a basic level, evidenced in the way they pray, they get tripped up in semantics. They teach the Oneness thing, but they pray to the Father, by the power of the Spirit, in the name of Jesus. They still differentiate the Godhead.

They occasionally let the students know, my teen daughters included, that we are in error (especially in bible class). When challenged by my 16-year old (respectfully), who referred to her “ordained minister Dad” as a Trinitarian, she was told I was in rebellion.

Oh well.
_________________
The World As I See It
http://worldjeffreysees.blogspot.com/

Revuriah's Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeff-Richard/1226257444

Jeffrey David Richard's Myspace Music
www.myspace.com/547856946
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss
Posts: 3682
4/6/18 11:23 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post I remember a well known camp meeting Bible teacher... roughridercog
Who got up to speak and said, "Are there any oneness people here?"

Several people in the crowd raised their hands.

He said, "We will wait while ya'all leave."

After they left he said, "Now that the devil is gone, we can have church."

Even as a very young teen, I thought this was out of line. Especially for a teacher with the Bible committed to memory.
_________________
Doctor of Bovinamodulation
Acts Mod
Posts: 25305
4/6/18 5:51 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: I remember a well known camp meeting Bible teacher... Dave Dorsey
roughridercog wrote:
Even as a very young teen, I thought this was out of line. Especially for a teacher with the Bible committed to memory.

Goodness gracious. Yes, completely out of line. Even if he thought that was true... uh, why not rejoice in an opportunity to preach the gospel to those he considered outside the faith?
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 13654
4/6/18 6:14 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow.