Actscelerate.com Forum Index Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
r/Actscelerate
Browse by what's: hot | new | rising | top of the week

Trump court hype much about nothing(L)
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
   Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Message Author
Post Trump court hype much about nothing(L) Resident Skeptic
Trump just clarified his remarks to the point that even a cigar store Indian could understand them. He did not need to clarify anything to unbiased, rationale people. Trump's only crime is that he is a straight white male who has not learned his place....


Quote:
It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage. I am friends with and employ thousands of people of Mexican and Hispanic descent. The American justice system relies on fair and impartial judges. All judges should be held to that standard. I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial.

Over the past few weeks, I have watched as the media has reported one inaccuracy after another concerning the ongoing litigation involving Trump University. There are several important facts the public should know and that the media has failed to report.

Throughout the litigation my attorneys have continually demonstrated that students who participated in Trump University were provided a substantive, valuable education based upon a curriculum developed by professors from Northwestern University, Columbia Business School, Stanford University and other respected institutions. And, the response from students was overwhelming. Over a five year period, more than 10,000 paying students filled out surveys giving the courses high marks and expressing their overwhelming satisfaction with Trump University’s programs. For example:

Former student Tarla Makaeff, the original plaintiff in the litigation, not only completed multiple surveys rating Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in every category, but also praised Trump University’s mentorship program in a glowing 5 plus minute video testimonial. When asked “how could Trump University help to meet [her] goals”, she simply stated “[c]ontinue to offer great classes.” Once the plaintiffs’ lawyers realized how disastrous a witness she was, they asked to have her removed from the case. Over my lawyers’ objections, the judge granted the plaintiffs’ motion, but allowed the case to continue.
Art Cohen, a lead plaintiffs in the litigation, completed a survey in which he not only rated Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in virtually every category, but went so far as to indicate that he would “attend another Trump University seminar” and even “recommend Trump University seminars to a friend.” When asked how Trump University could improve the seminar, Mr. Cohen’s only suggestion was to “[h]ave lunch sandwiches brought in” and make the lunch break 45 minutes.
Former student Bob Giullo, who has been critical of Trump University in numerous interviews and negative advertisements from my political opponents, also expressed his satisfaction, rating Trump University’s programs “excellent” in every category. When asked how Trump University could improve its programs, Mr. Giullo simply asked that students be provided “more comfortable chairs.”

Indeed, these are just a few of literally thousands of positive surveys, all of which can be viewed online at www.98percentapproval.com.

For those students who decided that Trump University’s programs were not for them, the company had a generous refund policy, offering a full refund to any student who asked for their money back within 3 days of signing up for a program or by the end of the first day of any multi-day program, whichever came later.

Normally, legal issues in a civil case would be heard in a neutral environment. However, given my unique circumstances as nominee of the Republican Party and the core issues of my campaign that focus on illegal immigration, jobs and unfair trade, I have concerns as to my ability to receive a fair trial.

I am fighting hard to bring jobs back to the United States. Many companies – like Ford, General Motors, Nabisco, Carrier – are moving production to Mexico. Drugs and illegal immigrants are also pouring across our border. This is bad for all Americans, regardless of their heritage.

Due to what I believe are unfair and mistaken rulings in this case and the Judge’s reported associations with certain professional organizations, questions were raised regarding the Obama appointed Judge’s impartiality. It is a fair question. I hope it is not the case.

While this lawsuit should have been dismissed, it is now scheduled for trial in November. I do not intend to comment on this matter any further. With all of the thousands of people who have given the courses such high marks and accolades, we will win this case!

Donald J. Trump



https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-fires-off-lengthy-000000746.html
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
6/7/16 8:23 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Cojak
RS, I am not trying to be a smart --s, but we all know Trump did not write that answer. That was written by someone Trump should be listening to before he opens his mouth on something controversial. In the case of the court case he should have left it out of his 'campaign', it has absolutely nothing to do with his running for president. If the case is as simple as that statement, he should have never said a word and let the attorneys handle the case.

No litigation should be done via the media.

It would have been very wise for Trump to have kept his mouth shut. I am wondering if that is possible, and I want him to win. If it was as simple as is stated in this 'clarification' (which is well written and very well worded), he shouldn't have said to his surrogates, "Go get the judge". That is more of the Nixon attitude, 'Let's get (more than) even'.

BUT thanks for posting his 'clarification' I had not read it. Cool
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
6/7/16 9:05 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
he can't fix this, its over for him. The only chance we have to avoid Hillary now is for the RNC to deny him at the convention. I didn't want to see that but what choice do they have? Trump is not only going to lose to Hillary, he's going to take congress down with him. He's a disaster. Even Newt and many of his supporters are turning on him now. Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
6/7/16 11:25 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
UncleJD wrote:
he can't fix this, its over for him. The only chance we have to avoid Hillary now is for the RNC to deny him at the convention. I didn't want to see that but what choice do they have? Trump is not only going to lose to Hillary, he's going to take congress down with him. He's a disaster. Even Newt and many of his supporters are turning on him now.



You can only hope he's done. How many other times has he been "done"?As more facts come out about this judge, it will be apparent Trump's concerns were valid. He, once again, has outfoxed the media. Now allot of attention will be drawn to La Raza for the racist group that it is.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
6/8/16 5:09 am


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
Cojak wrote:
RS, I am not trying to be a smart --s, but we all know Trump did not write that answer. That was written by someone Trump should be listening to before he opens his mouth on something controversial. In the case of the court case he should have left it out of his 'campaign', it has absolutely nothing to do with his running for president. If the case is as simple as that statement, he should have never said a word and let the attorneys handle the case.

No litigation should be done via the media.

It would have been very wise for Trump to have kept his mouth shut. I am wondering if that is possible, and I want him to win. If it was as simple as is stated in this 'clarification' (which is well written and very well worded), he shouldn't have said to his surrogates, "Go get the judge". That is more of the Nixon attitude, 'Let's get (more than) even'.

BUT thanks for posting his 'clarification' I had not read it. Cool


I doubt the media will leave his court case out of the campaign.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
6/8/16 5:24 am


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Eddie Robbins
Pass me some grape Kool-Aid. 😂😂😂 Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16509
6/8/16 6:42 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Nature Boy Florida
Trump's mouth continues to "finish" him.

Conventional wisdom says it finishes him.

Somehow, he continues to come out ahead. I am as baffled as the next guy.

But, whether accidentally or not, Trump's gut instinct shows he was right about this judge.

Question to ponder.... If judges aren't biased one way or another, why all the consternation regarding picking the next Supreme Court justice?

I had to go to court once, and when the judge for my case was selected, my lawyer said, that's good because he is known to be _____________. My lawyer was right.
_________________
Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going today!
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16646
6/8/16 7:15 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
Resident Skeptic wrote:


You can only hope he's done.


Nope, I BELIEVE he's done. There is a difference. I believe he's an idiot, I don't HOPE he's an idiot. I BELIEVE Hillary will destroy him. I don't HOPE that. I HOPE that somehow Hillary is not POTUS come January. I BELIEVE she will be. I BELIEVE that everyone who can't see the truth will have a rude awaking in November, but I HOPE I'm wrong about that.
You may not remember that though I have been vehemently anti-Trump, I am more anti-Hillary and have decided that I will probably hold-my nose and vote for the doofus unless someone else is polling as high as he is.
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
6/8/16 10:59 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post georgiapath
Nature Boy Florida wrote:
Trump's mouth continues to "finish" him.

Conventional wisdom says it finishes him.

Somehow, he continues to come out ahead. I am as baffled as the next guy.

But, whether accidentally or not, Trump's gut instinct shows he was right about this judge.

Question to ponder.... If judges aren't biased one way or another, why all the consternation regarding picking the next Supreme Court justice?

I had to go to court once, and when the judge for my case was selected, my lawyer said, that's good because he is known to be _____________. My lawyer was right.



Amen, Hillary should have been done months ago. She has done far worse than Trump could think of doing.
Acts-dicted
Posts: 7604
6/8/16 11:08 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
georgiapath wrote:


Amen, Hillary should have been done months ago. She has done far worse than Trump could think of doing.


That is your opinion. I share it as a conservative Republican, but most voters will see the email thing as a political game. Granted, many (not all) Trump voters see the same game on the court-case, but its the independent voters and cross-over Democrat voters that would have to push Trump over the top.
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
6/8/16 11:12 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post georgiapath
Hillary had on a $12,000.00 coat last night. The bunch of black people behind her cheering, probably couldn't have scraped up $100.00 between them. Is that what you people want for a president? Acts-dicted
Posts: 7604
6/8/16 11:30 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
georgiapath wrote:
Hillary had on a $12,000.00 coat last night. The bunch of black people behind her cheering, probably couldn't have scraped up $100.00 between them. Is that what you people want for a president?


Not sure who "you people" is but I'd say nobody on this forum wants Hillary Clinton to be president. However if you're going to suggest voting based on status-symbol clothing, I think you'll need to set this one out LOL
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
6/8/16 11:41 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post c6thplayer1
I'm not voting for either of the two...

One could say that not voting for trump is a vote for hillary , but on the other hand not voting for hillary is a vote for trump. In my opinion neither are worthy of being our president.
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6385
6/8/16 1:16 pm


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
c6thplayer1 wrote:
I'm not voting for either of the two...

One could say that not voting for trump is a vote for hillary , but on the other hand not voting for hillary is a vote for trump. In my opinion neither are worthy of being our president.


I agree and won't preach at you for your decision since I blame those that voted for the man in the primary and believe they are the ones that should have practiced better judgement, not the ones they left with literally NO choice. I'm VERY open to a good third-party candidate and if he polls 20% or better I will vote for Gary Johnson without hesitation.
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
6/8/16 1:45 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
Quote:
As more facts come out about this judge, it will be apparent Trump's concerns were valid.


seriously?
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
6/8/16 1:58 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post c6thplayer1
bonnie knox wrote:
Quote:
As more facts come out about this judge, it will be apparent Trump's concerns were valid.


seriously?


You think this is all just a smoke screen to divert attention away from the issue of scamming students?
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6385
6/8/16 4:41 pm


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
Here's the long and short of it.

It is racist for a white man (Trump in this case) to accuse a Latino man of racism (in this case, a judge).

Only white people can be racist.

Mitch McConnell, John Kasich, Paul Ryan, and Scott Walker obviously endorse this definition of racism. And they still can't figure out how Trump won the nomination.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
6/9/16 4:12 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
The long and short of it is that Trump cannot restrain himself from attacking others when things don't go his way. I'm not aware of any evidence that the judge has been unfair in his rulings. [Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
6/9/16 5:44 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
bonnie knox wrote:
The long and short of it is that Trump cannot restrain himself from attacking others when things don't go his way. I'm not aware of any evidence that the judge has been unfair in his rulings.


Bonnie, its unfair anytime anyone says anything negative about Trump. He's our dear leader.
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
6/10/16 7:59 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
UncleJD wrote:
bonnie knox wrote:
The long and short of it is that Trump cannot restrain himself from attacking others when things don't go his way. I'm not aware of any evidence that the judge has been unfair in his rulings.


Bonnie, its unfair anytime anyone says anything negative about Trump. He's our dear leader.



Not at all. I just hate to see Christians continuing to play the race card when they want to hurt a candidate. You mmight as well vote for Hillary.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
6/10/16 8:53 am


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow.