The powers that be clearly want to clamp down much harder on social media interaction, judging by the GA Agenda item we just received. On first reading, it appears to give far greater subjective judgment to what would constitute irresponsible use of social media, by including quite subjectively defined concepts such as being “harsh” to its list of forbidden things on social media. No doubt the many CoG snowflakes amongst us will be the first to cry “harsh” and to accuse tellers of uncomfortable truths of being unloving.
No doubt about it, the powers that be are riled up about all the flak they’ve received about Lee in recent years, and are looking to stifle dissent. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12809
Yesterday at 11:07 am
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
2024 General Assembly agenda item on social media
