| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Message |
Author |
 Doctrine and Polity topics--if you could choose, what would you like to see addressed? |
bonnie knox |
| If you were responsible for choosing the topics to be addressed by the Doctrine and Polity Committee, what would you choose? |
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
10/28/17 8:38 am
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
| Re: Doctrine and Polity topics--if you could choose, what would you like to see addressed? |
Old Time Country Preacher |
| bonnie knox wrote: | | If you were responsible for choosing the topics to be addressed by the Doctrine and Polity Committee, what would you choose? |
Pre-Trib Rapture
Instantaneous/Progressive Sanctification
What constitutes a genuine revival as opposed to quackery
Position paper on woffie teaching
Divine Healing |
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 15570
10/28/17 2:13 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| Re: Doctrine and Polity topics--if you could choose, what would you like to see addressed? |
roughridercog |
| Old Time Country Preacher wrote: | | bonnie knox wrote: | | If you were responsible for choosing the topics to be addressed by the Doctrine and Polity Committee, what would you choose? |
Pre-Trib Rapture
Instantaneous/Progressive Sanctification
What constitutes a genuine revival as opposed to quackery
Position paper on woffie teaching
Divine Healing |
h
Catchers at the altar. Yes or no? 
_________________
Doctor of Bovinamodulation |
Acts Mod
Posts: 25306
10/28/17 2:42 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Chicago27 |
| A clear statement on OSAS and some room for those who cannot support Initial Evidence since the Bible doesn’t support it either. One more. It’s OK to say that the COG doesn’t allow alcohol but you cannot say that Christians must not. It’s not for a group of COG men to decide what other Christians believe. |
Friendly Face
Posts: 253
10/28/17 8:26 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Old Time Country Preacher |
| Chicago27 wrote: | | It’s OK to say that the COG doesn’t allow alcohol but you cannot say that Christians must not. |
Ummmmmm, we done said it C? |
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 15570
10/28/17 9:51 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Quiet Wyatt |
| Position papers are nice I suppose, but since they don’t constitute an official change in the DoF, Doctrinal Commitments, or Practical Commitments, they really don’t change anything. If a credentialed CoG minister says he doesn’t agree with the position paper, there really is nothing that can be done to him, so long as he continues to affirm official CoG doctrine as set forth in the DoF and Doctrinal and Practical Commitments. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12803
10/28/17 9:54 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| Position Paper |
Change Agent |
| Tithing, escpeially since keeping the Sabbath is no big deal. |
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1449
10/29/17 10:51 am
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
UncleJD |
| Old Time Country Preacher wrote: | | Chicago27 wrote: | | It’s OK to say that the COG doesn’t allow alcohol but you cannot say that Christians must not. |
Ummmmmm, we done said it C? |
Depends on which side of the Atlantic you're on according to the COG |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3145
10/29/17 6:32 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Da Sheik |
| I’m really not interested in reading any COG position papers. Anything written is going to be consistent with what has always been the status quo in the COG. Lots of biased prooftext arguments. A paper on tithing is going to start with Melchizedek and go farther off course from there. “But tithing predates the lawâ€, one might argue. So does marrying your sister. |
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1860
10/30/17 2:26 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cojak |
| Da Sheik wrote: | | I’m really not interested in reading any COG position papers. Anything written is going to be consistent with what has always been the status quo in the COG. Lots of biased prooftext arguments. A paper on tithing is going to start with Melchizedek and go farther off course from there. “But tithing predates the lawâ€, one might argue. So does marrying your sister. |
OUCH! 
But what you said in the beginning in my opinion is factual.
As a member I look at these 'position papers' as 'justification or solidifying' something the general Church upholds. NO ONE in authority (In his right mind) would put forth in our church that tithing 10% is not in fact ordered. I have always wondered if we were so sure why is it not a 'test of membership' as the LDS. 
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/ |
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24282
10/30/17 9:06 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
