Actscelerate.com Forum Index Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
r/Actscelerate

Are we justified in anthropomorphizing God?

 
   Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Message Author
Post Are we justified in anthropomorphizing God? Aaron Scott
It came to me the other day that God can differentiate between colors and the such.

And He can hear sounds.

On and on.

If we say, no, He just somehow perceives that with His mind, we are still anthropomorphizing God, giving Him a mind, etc.

So just HOW DOES God perceive something in our realm?

I'm trying to find some way of explains how He can discern colors and the things He created without some way of perceiving them

I'm not making a doctrine out of it..I simply would like to hear your thoughts in addressing the above.
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6032
9/26/16 6:47 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Old Time Country Preacher
We are justified in as much as the Scriptures anthropomorphize God.

Under his wings

Eyes of the Lord are upon the righteous

Ears of the Lord are open to their cry

Hand of the Lord stretched out

Etc.
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 15564
9/26/16 6:56 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
Old Time Country Preacher wrote:
We are justified in as much as the Scriptures anthropomorphize God.

Under his wings

Eyes of the Lord are upon the righteous

Ears of the Lord are open to their cry

Hand of the Lord stretched out

Etc.


Right hand of God.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
9/26/16 9:05 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post So are we agreed that God does have real eyes? Aaron Scott
I hear a lot of talk about how God is a spirit and does not have characteristics we would consider human (physically). But again, if not then how does he know the color red from green? Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6032
9/27/16 5:59 am


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Link
I had a conversation with a Calvinist once and pointed out that God said that certain sacrifices to Baal had never entered His mind. He said that was anthropomorphism. I asked if anthropomorphism was just an excuse to hold on to Calvinism and heavy determinism. Is it interpreting the scripture through the lens of Calvinism, making Calvinism more important than what the Bible says.

There is a danger that when scripture doesn't fit our world view, we find a way to argue it away, like anthropomorphism or hyperbole. Liberals like to dismiss certain moral issues in the Bible by arguing that it was for that culture.
_________________
Link
Acts-perienced Poster
Posts: 11849
9/27/16 6:20 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: So are we agreed that God does have real eyes? (L) bonnie knox
I'm getting an image of two worms discussing human beings. One says to the other, "So if humans don't crawl, how do they get from one place to another?"
And I don't mean that to be derisive of your question. It just struck me as funny.
Have you ever heard Louie Giglio give his talk about how small the earth is compared to the stars that were created? If you believe God created the universe, and you start trying to grasp how big that is, you get the idea, that God is more overwhelming than you can imagine.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=louie+giglio&&view=detail&mid=A8752245A50A4AE0A8EEA8752245A50A4AE0A8EE&FORM=VRDGAR

Aaron Scott wrote:
I hear a lot of talk about how God is a spirit and does not have characteristics we would consider human (physically). But again, if not then how does he know the color red from green?
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
9/27/16 7:12 am


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Eddie Robbins
There are things we can never understand and I'm ok with that. I do like to think and discuss about them but in the end, we can't comprehend. I told the story of how my daughter moved to Germany and left her cat behind. She decided to have a friend bring her cat to Berlin. The night before her friend picked up her cat, we Facetimed and she saw her cat with me, my daughter in Berlin and me in Georgia. The next night, her cat had arrived in Berlin and we, once again, Facetimed. This time, her cat was in Berlin with her. Try explaining that to the cat. Smile Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16509
9/27/16 7:38 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Hebrew Language & Anthropomorphisms Mark Ledbetter
The Hebrew language generally is more concrete than abstract and so it is easy to find their perspectives in anthropomorphic expressions. It is the Hebrew mind expressing in human terms what they cannot express in any other way.

To express God as established and immovable, Deuteronomy 32:4 describes God as a Rock. Is He literally a rock?

So anthropomorphic expressions are attempts to capture the abstract in concrete terms.

Metaphor and simile are similarly used.

Hebrew also utilizes word puns and idioms.

If I remember correctly, there are approximately 20,000 Hebrew Words, compared to 100,000 Biblical Greek words. When searching for a Greek equivalent for Hebrew, the Hebrew thought borrows from the closest Greek word, or words, to express the thought.
_________________
God-Honoring
Christ-Centered
Bible-Based
Spirit-Led
(This is how I want to be)
Golf Cart Mafia Associate
Posts: 2109
9/27/16 7:55 am


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
Quote:
To express God as established and immovable, Deuteronomy 32:4 describes God as a Rock. Is He literally a rock?


good example
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
9/27/16 7:59 am


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Old Time Country Preacher
Eddie Robbins wrote:
There are things we can never understand and I'm ok with that. I do like to think and discuss about them but in the end, we can't comprehend. I told the story of how my daughter moved to Germany and left her cat behind. She decided to have a friend bring her cat to Berlin. The night before her friend picked up her cat, we Facetimed and she saw her cat with me, my daughter in Berlin and me in Georgia. The next night, her cat had arrived in Berlin and we, once again, Facetimed. This time, her cat was in Berlin with her. Try explaining that to the cat. Smile


If while en route to Deutschland the cat walked under the Cleveland portal, hey, it would meow in English and explain FaceTime.
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 15564
9/27/16 8:06 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt
One could certainly make the argument that, since God is spirit, all bodily descriptions of Him must be figurative and not strictly literal. Then the question becomes one of degrees; how far are we willing to take the argument? And what real advantage is there in denying that, for instance, the God who is spirit has a literal mouth?

That said, I have yet to see any good reason to consider God's mind, thoughts, and intentions as being anything like an anthropomorphism. But the Calvinists are quick to characterize God purposefully changing His mind/will as recorded many times in Scripture as being absolutely impossible, and by definition an anthropomorphism. Their preconceived theology simply cannot allow for any possible change in the mind of God, no matter what God's self-revelation of His mind in Scripture may say.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12792
9/27/16 9:38 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt...I wonder... Aaron Scott
I wonder if the whole "God is a SPIRIT" thing has been somewhat twisted via movies, etc.? That is, where a "spirit" is some sort of nebulous, not-quite-as-real-as-we-are being?

I have come to think that the truth is just the opposite. That is, that the spiritual realm is MORE REAL than our realm. For instance, the tabernacle was but a COPY of what was in the heavens.

IF IF IF that is the case, then, it might be, that instead of thinking that being in the IMAGE of God doesn't mean physical characteristics, but is instead that nebulous sort of stuff (free will, emotions, and so forth), it might ALSO include the physical aspects.

I actually believe that Adam's BODY was also in the image of God. No, God is NOT a man, but man is a COPY (of sorts) of God. This includes the more tangible aspects, as well as the intangible.

Possible?
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6032
9/27/16 3:17 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Link
Quiet Wyatt

Have you ever seen a spirit without arms and legs? How many spirits have ou seen? Does your own spirit have arms and legs? How would you know how to answer that question?

Angels are spirits. Do they have arms and legs? They probably appeared to when they appeared to people in the Bible.

It could be that physical arms and legs correspond to some kind of spiritual arms and legs. I know that sounds speculative. But saying that a spirit does not have a mouth is also rather speculative. Why speculate?

Man is created in the image of God. Could these physical attributes of ours correspond to something that God has?

Something else to ask is whether Hebrews hearing and reading the scriptures 3000 years ago would have thought this way about arms, legs, and spirits without the last 3000 years of theology and philosophy.
_________________
Link
Acts-perienced Poster
Posts: 11849
9/27/16 6:27 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Link
When the disciples saw Jesus walking on water, they were terrified. They thought He was a spirit. There was Jesus, with a head, arms, and legs, out in the distance, and the thought he was a spirit. The disciples apparently thought spirits had or could have arms and legs, or could appear to have them.

Jesus ate food to show the disciples that He was not a spirit. But He appeared as a man.

Someone who believes God has a mouth could say spirits can have mouths because the Bible talks about God's mouths and the Bible says God is a Spirit. Where does the Bible teach that spirits can't have or do not have arms, mouths, etc?
_________________
Link
Acts-perienced Poster
Posts: 11849
9/27/16 6:58 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post and, Mark Ledbetter
Link wrote:
When the disciples saw Jesus walking on water, they were terrified. They thought He was a spirit. There was Jesus, with a head, arms, and legs, out in the distance, and the thought he was a spirit. The disciples apparently thought spirits had or could have arms and legs, or could appear to have them.

Jesus ate food to show the disciples that He was not a spirit. But He appeared as a man.

Someone who believes God has a mouth could say spirits can have mouths because the Bible talks about God's mouths and the Bible says God is a Spirit. Where does the Bible teach that spirits can't have or do not have arms, mouths, etc?


where does it teach spirits can have or do have arms, mouths, etc.?

And, why does it matter?
_________________
God-Honoring
Christ-Centered
Bible-Based
Spirit-Led
(This is how I want to be)
Golf Cart Mafia Associate
Posts: 2109
9/27/16 7:07 pm


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt
Link wrote:
Quiet Wyatt

Have you ever seen a spirit without arms and legs? How many spirits have ou seen? Does your own spirit have arms and legs? How would you know how to answer that question?

Angels are spirits. Do they have arms and legs? They probably appeared to when they appeared to people in the Bible.

It could be that physical arms and legs correspond to some kind of spiritual arms and legs. I know that sounds speculative. But saying that a spirit does not have a mouth is also rather speculative. Why speculate?


In reading again my post as well as your response to it, Link, I have to say that either I was unclear or you misunderstood my post. To hopefully clarify, I will say that I was definitely not claiming that God has no mouth or that spirits have no mouths. What I was attempting to ask was what real advantage there is in denying that the God (who is spirit) has no real mouth--which is what the appeal to anthropomorphism tries to do, not what I contend for at all. Let me be as plain as I can be: I affirm that the God (who is spirit) has a mouth, not because I have ever seen a spirit, but because the Bible says it, and I see no good reason to make that particular expression out to be figurative.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12792
9/27/16 7:08 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Link
Quiet Wyatt wrote:
Link wrote:
Quiet Wyatt

Have you ever seen a spirit without arms and legs? How many spirits have ou seen? Does your own spirit have arms and legs? How would you know how to answer that question?

Angels are spirits. Do they have arms and legs? They probably appeared to when they appeared to people in the Bible.

It could be that physical arms and legs correspond to some kind of spiritual arms and legs. I know that sounds speculative. But saying that a spirit does not have a mouth is also rather speculative. Why speculate?


In reading again my post as well as your response to it, Link, I have to say that either I was unclear or you misunderstood my post. To hopefully clarify, I will say that I was definitely not claiming that God has no mouth or that spirits have no mouths. What I was attempting to ask was what real advantage there is in denying that the God (who is spirit) has no real mouth--which is what the appeal to anthropomorphism tries to do, not what I contend for at all. Let me be as plain as I can be: I affirm that the God (who is spirit) has a mouth, not because I have ever seen a spirit, but because the Bible says it, and I see no good reason to make that particular expression out to be figurative.


Sorry for misreading. I read late at night and early AM and posted fast.
_________________
Link
Acts-perienced Poster
Posts: 11849
9/28/16 4:04 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Question? Mark Ledbetter
Does the earth have a mouth?
_________________
God-Honoring
Christ-Centered
Bible-Based
Spirit-Led
(This is how I want to be)
Golf Cart Mafia Associate
Posts: 2109
9/28/16 6:43 am


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Re: Question? bonnie knox
Mark Ledbetter wrote:
Does the earth have a mouth?


It must have. It has swallowed a lot of people.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
9/28/16 7:09 am


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
If God has a mouth, are we all inside it?
Revelation 3:15-17
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
9/28/16 7:12 am


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow.