View previous topic :: View next topic |
Message |
Author |
When Given a Blood Transfusion, Does "Old Blood" Equal "New Blood?" |
Old Time Country Preacher |
With all the comments about the need for "new blood" on the Ex Committee and Ex Council, I got to thinkin bout the "Old Blood/New Blood" thing.
Ifn for instance a feller in his 60's got a bold new vision for souls and commenced engaging the harvest with a paradigm shift/new methodology, would this be like gittin new blood? |
Acts-pert Poster Posts: 15566 6/18/16 11:55 pm
|
|
| |
|
|
For me... |
Mark Ledbetter |
it is the revival of the call that has laid dormant for 12 years.
Methodologies may change but the call doesn't.
I believe John Wesley would have readily engaged social media as a medium for propagating the Gospel. _________________ God-Honoring
Christ-Centered
Bible-Based
Spirit-Led
(This is how I want to be) |
Golf Cart Mafia Associate Posts: 2109 6/19/16 9:28 am
|
|
| |
|
|
c6thplayer1 |
Dont really like all these new terms .. Thats all I have to say about that. |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6385 6/19/16 11:01 am
|
|
| |
|
|
bonnie knox |
Ole Timer, I can see this ere thing is a weighin on ya mind on account of tha fact ya done started bout 3 threads tryin to cipher what Tom meant exactly when he done called for new blood.
I think what ya might need ta do is take a lesson from rabbit huntin. When ya callin ya beagles, ya kindly speak their language. So if ya want Tom ta explain (an I ain't callin Tom no beagle, so don't git off scent ere), ya need ta say,
"Tom, son, can ya unpack at for me?"
An then ya need to git ready, cause when Tom takes a notion to start unpackin, well he's liable ta write 4 or 5 paragraphs along with some bullet points. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 6/20/16 12:39 pm
|
|
| |
|
|