View previous topic :: View next topic |
Message |
Author |
To what extent did Paul have say-so over the choice he mentions in Philippians 2:23? |
bonnie knox |
This came up in Sunday school this morning. One person was of the opinion (but not dogmatic) that the wording implied Paul had a choice over whether to go on or not. (I'm guessing this is a result of Kenneth Hagin's teaching that a person can choose when he or she wants to die).
I was of the opinion that Paul wasn't actually getting to choose, that he was just laying out the pros and cons of the possibilities of getting a death sentence and was saying even if it were up to him, he would have a hard time choosing whether to live and continue to minister or to go on be with Christ. Of course, I didn't have time to say that in Sunday school; I only had time to go on record as saying I disagreed with the other person's opinion.
Thoughts? |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 8/28/16 12:21 pm
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cojak |
Funny, I don't see that as being any where close to him choosing. It seemed he was 'standingby', ready to take what was to come along.
But I ain't very deep into 'guessing' and I sure don't know _________________ Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/ |
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24278 8/28/16 1:03 pm
|
|
| |
|
|