Actscelerate.com Forum Index Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
r/Actscelerate

Rubio Rising

 
   Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Message Author
Post Rubio Rising UncleJD
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit, but its not unexpected, you can expect the establishment to throw everything they can at this. They would 100 times rather have Rubio than Trump or Cruz. Look for Christie to be talked into dropping out soon to throw his weight (no pun intended) behind Rubio like Santorum has.
http://www.whdh.com/story/31137507/hiller-instinct-7newsumass-lowell-new-hampshire-tracking-poll-day-4
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3138
2/4/16 11:50 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Dave Dorsey
There was a good article this morning about why the establishment really hates Cruz, and how Rubio fills those voids for them.

Quote:
What makes Cruz so hated is simply that he is smart enough to do without the Establishment. Cruz likes to compare himself to Reagan, whose autodicactic education in foreign policy gave him independence of judgment and confidence to pursue victory in the Cold War when the Establishment of his day thought it impossible. In many ways, Cruz will have a bigger problem if elected: for a decade prior to Reagan’s victory, the neo-conservatives (led by their “godfather” Irving Kristol) had trained cadre, ground out academic articles, and sparred over the big themes in the op-ed columns of the major media. Today the pickings are much slimmer. It’s not so much that the emperor has no clothes, but that the empire has no tailors.

Cruz, if elected, will have to do his own thinking, to an extent that no American president has had to do since Lincoln. He is intelligent enough and arrogant enough to do that, and he will owe no favors or patronage to the Establishment. He would be the cleverest man to occupy the oval office in a century and a half. He carries no baggage from the Bush administration, and will not invite the Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol or Fox News’ Charles Krauthammer to draft an inaugural address, as did Bush in 2004. He won the Iowa caucuses by building the strongest grass-roots network in the country (he claims to have a campaign chairman in every county of the United States), which makes him independent of the party apparatus, such as it is.

Endearing, boyish, photogenic and eloquent, Marco Rubio is the candidate that Central Casting sent the Establishment from the studio pool. Rubio, a middling student at university and a Florida machine politician throughout his career, says his lines well but does not have an original thought about foreign policy. That is why the Establishment likes him. Cruz knows that the Establishment is naked, and is willing to say so. That’s why they don’t like him. They aren’t supposed to. They look at him the way a rice bowl looks at a hammer.

http://atimes.com/2016/02/iowa-and-the-world/
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 13654
2/4/16 12:03 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
Dave Dorsey wrote:
There was a good article this morning about why the establishment really hates Cruz, and how Rubio fills those voids for them.

Quote:
What makes Cruz so hated is simply that he is smart enough to do without the Establishment. Cruz likes to compare himself to Reagan, whose autodicactic education in foreign policy gave him independence of judgment and confidence to pursue victory in the Cold War when the Establishment of his day thought it impossible. In many ways, Cruz will have a bigger problem if elected: for a decade prior to Reagan’s victory, the neo-conservatives (led by their “godfather” Irving Kristol) had trained cadre, ground out academic articles, and sparred over the big themes in the op-ed columns of the major media. Today the pickings are much slimmer. It’s not so much that the emperor has no clothes, but that the empire has no tailors.

Cruz, if elected, will have to do his own thinking, to an extent that no American president has had to do since Lincoln. He is intelligent enough and arrogant enough to do that, and he will owe no favors or patronage to the Establishment. He would be the cleverest man to occupy the oval office in a century and a half. He carries no baggage from the Bush administration, and will not invite the Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol or Fox News’ Charles Krauthammer to draft an inaugural address, as did Bush in 2004. He won the Iowa caucuses by building the strongest grass-roots network in the country (he claims to have a campaign chairman in every county of the United States), which makes him independent of the party apparatus, such as it is.

Endearing, boyish, photogenic and eloquent, Marco Rubio is the candidate that Central Casting sent the Establishment from the studio pool. Rubio, a middling student at university and a Florida machine politician throughout his career, says his lines well but does not have an original thought about foreign policy. That is why the Establishment likes him. Cruz knows that the Establishment is naked, and is willing to say so. That’s why they don’t like him. They aren’t supposed to. They look at him the way a rice bowl looks at a hammer.

http://atimes.com/2016/02/iowa-and-the-world/


Nicely written and exactly how I see it too. Rubio is a useful tool. Cruz is his own man. Cruz is not Reagan, but his independence of thought is the closest thing we'll see in most of our lifetimes. I'm afraid that the writing is on the wall though. Reagan benefited from the fact that the natural conservatives in the democratic party had not heard the message they needed to hear to finally leave it, there are none left there and since then the GOP has become more and more big-government, neo-con, spendaholics who would rather go along with the other side than to kill their cash cows in the insurance industry (among others). They may pay lip-service to Reagan, but they'd turn him out just like they tried to in 1980, and just like they are trying to do with Cruz today.
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3138
2/4/16 12:18 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Brandon Bohannon
This is all good stuff to know and consider...

I had a thought this morning that concerns me for our options this year. After the blood bath that is about to ensue, will we have a candidate unsoiled and unbloodied enough to be electable?

This has to be making the Dems very happy as they see the Republican field devour itself. I'm concerned that our final solution will be a neutered one.
_________________
Proverbs 3:5-6; John 13:34-35; Acts 1:8
Acts-celerater
Posts: 571
2/4/16 12:51 pm


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
Brandon Bohannon wrote:
This is all good stuff to know and consider...

I had a thought this morning that concerns me for our options this year. After the blood bath that is about to ensue, will we have a candidate unsoiled and unbloodied enough to be electable?

This has to be making the Dems very happy as they see the Republican field devour itself. I'm concerned that our final solution will be a neutered one.


The Dems are fairing no better although the media will spin it as though they are. They are doing so badly that an elderly, white, Independent, Socialist who hasn't been a Democrat in years is ahead of their establishment's anointed one in New Hampshire and running close in all national polls. If Joe Biden had ran, there would be no contest in that race, Hillary is NOT as well liked as everyone thinks.
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3138
2/4/16 1:04 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Brandon Bohannon
UncleJD wrote:
Brandon Bohannon wrote:
This is all good stuff to know and consider...

I had a thought this morning that concerns me for our options this year. After the blood bath that is about to ensue, will we have a candidate unsoiled and unbloodied enough to be electable?

This has to be making the Dems very happy as they see the Republican field devour itself. I'm concerned that our final solution will be a neutered one.


The Dems are fairing no better although the media will spin it as though they are. They are doing so badly that an elderly, white, Independent, Socialist who hasn't been a Democrat in years is ahead of their establishment's anointed one in New Hampshire and running close in all national polls. If Joe Biden had ran, there would be no contest in that race, Hillary is NOT as well liked as everyone thinks.
Yes sir. I hope that you are right.
_________________
Proverbs 3:5-6; John 13:34-35; Acts 1:8
Acts-celerater
Posts: 571
2/4/16 1:13 pm


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post AussieRain
Rush said yesterday that there is a difference between being a part of the establishment, and being someone who the establishment can accept and support. He says that Rubio is nothing but a legitimate conservative and is not a member of the establishment. On the gang of 8, he said no one is pure, no one is perfect. He likes Rubio alot. Friendly Face
Posts: 198
2/4/16 1:56 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Eddie Robbins
What I don't understand is why you wouldn't want an established Republican. If they don't be in the establishment, get out and start a new party. Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16509
2/4/16 2:41 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
All of the South Carolina elite are lining up with Rubio. It will not work, however. He has reached his high water mark.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
2/4/16 3:45 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
Eddie Robbins wrote:
What I don't understand is why you wouldn't want an established Republican. If they don't be in the establishment, get out and start a new party.
That would have been bad advice in 1980. But I hear ya, I don't know how much longer we can keep beating this old dead horse, 'er elephant
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3138
2/4/16 4:02 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Eddie Robbins
It reminds me of church. Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16509
2/4/16 4:06 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident AussieRain
Resident aren't you a big Rush fan? Do you disagree with his analysis? And did you see the questions I asked you in a different thread? Just curious on some things. Friendly Face
Posts: 198
2/4/16 5:33 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow.